Veo 3.1 vs Seedance 2.5: Rankings, Specs and Access

Last verified 2026-10-07 · Comparison · How we compare · Evidence
4K output, public per-second prices

Veo 3.1

Google

Google's current video model: 8 s[1] clips that extend to 148 s[1] at 720p, 4K output on 8-second clips[1] and native audio[2], billed per second in the Gemini API[3].

Leads both arena boards

Seedance 2.5

ByteDance Seed

ByteDance Seed's video model: up to 30 s[4] per generation, up to 50[4] image, video and audio references in a single pass, native audio and multi-shot output[4]. Text-to-video and image-to-video are both supported[4]; ByteDance publishes no per-second API price.

Quick verdict

Seedance 2.5 takes the quality evidence: it outscores veo-3.1-audio on both LMArena boards — 1474[5] to 1364[5] on text-to-video, 1477[6] to 1398[6] on image-to-video — and generates 30 s[4] in one pass where Veo 3.1 stops at 8 s[1]. Veo 3.1 stays the pick for documented delivery: 4K output on 8-second clips[1], extensions to 148 s[1], and a public price for every tier starting at $0.05/s[3] per second — none of which ByteDance matches in print.

Category winners are computed from the sourced rows in the tables below; “Depends” means there was not enough comparable public data to call it.

Summary

Google brought Veo 3.1 to the Gemini API on 2025-10-15[7], where it remains a paid preview[7]; ByteDance Seed followed with Seedance 2.5 on 2026-07-31[4], and its API is now generally available on BytePlus ModelArk[8]. Each generates native audio with the picture[2][4], and each can lengthen an existing video rather than only starting fresh.

They solve length in opposite ways. Seedance 2.5 produces up to 30 s[4] in a single pass and appends further shots through multi-round extension with no published ceiling[4]. Veo 3.1 generates 8 s[1] at a time, then extends 7 seconds per round to 148 s[1] at 720p[1]. Reference input is lopsided: 50[4] mixed inputs per pass for Seedance against 3[1] images for Veo. Resolution is lopsided the other way — Veo renders 1080p and 4K on 8-second clips[1], while the only official Seedance 2.5 figures are 480p and 720p[8].

Both arena boards list both models, and Seedance 2.5 leads each: rank #7[5] against #12[5] on text-to-video and rank #4[6] against #13[6] on image-to-video, with margins outside the confidence intervals. Pricing transparency runs the other way entirely: Google publishes per-second rates for every tier, from $0.05/s[3] (Lite, 720p) to $0.60/s[3] (Standard, 4K)[3], while ByteDance's API bills per million tokens and states no first-party per-second figure.

Snapshot

Veo 3.1 vs Seedance 2.5 at a glance (check dates per source in the Evidence list)
SpecVeo 3.1Seedance 2.5
StatusPaid preview in the Gemini API (Google's current model list names veo-3.1-generate-preview and veo-3.1-lite-generate-preview as Preview models; Veo 3.1 Fast rates are still published on the pricing page); also served via Vertex AI, the Gemini app and Flow[7]Generally available — API fully available to clients on BytePlus ModelArk; live in Jimeng Web and Doubao Pro[8]
DeveloperGoogle[7]ByteDance Seed[4]
Released2025-10-15[7]2026-07-31[4]
Lowest API price (per second, with audio)from $0.05/s (Lite)[3]No public data
Cheapest paid consumer plan$19.99/mo Google AI Pro
$99.99/mo Google AI Ultra[9]
No public data
Free tierGemini API free tier: Not available for Veo 3.1 Standard, Fast or Lite (paid tier only)[3]No public data
Max length, single generation8 s[1]30 s[4]
Max resolution4k (8s length only)[1]480p / 720p (BytePlus ModelArk plans)[8]
Native audioYes[2]Yes[4]
Image-to-videoYes[2]Yes[4]
Public APIYes[7]Yes (BytePlus ModelArk)[8]

Pricing

Depends — not enough comparable public data
Pricing: Veo 3.1 vs Seedance 2.5 (check dates per source in the Evidence list)
MetricVeo 3.1Seedance 2.5Leader
API price, 720p with audio (per second)$0.40/s Standard
$0.10/s Fast
$0.05/s Lite[3]
No public data—
API price, 1080p with audio (per second)$0.40/s Standard
$0.12/s Fast
$0.08/s Lite[3]
No public data—
API price, 4K (per second)$0.60/s Standard
$0.30/s Fast[3]
No public data—
API billing basisPer second of successfully generated video, with audio included by default; price varies by tier (Standard / Fast / Lite) and by output resolution (720p / 1080p / 4k)[3]No public data—
Cheapest paid consumer plan$19.99/mo Google AI Pro
$99.99/mo Google AI Ultra[9]
No public data—
Consumer plan ladderGoogle AI Pro $19.99/month (1,000 Google Flow Credits, limited trial of Veo 3.1 Lite); Google AI Ultra from $99.99/month (10,000 or 25,000 Google Flow Credits, full Veo 3.1)[9]No public data—
In-app cost per secondNo public dataDreamina app: $0.035 per generated second at 720p (Basic plan, first-month promotional price); $0.047 per second (Super annual, first-year price)[10]—
Free tierGemini API free tier: Not available for Veo 3.1 Standard, Fast or Lite (paid tier only)[3]No public data—

Veo 3.1 leads 0 rows, Seedance 2.5 leads 0, 0 tied; rows marked — have no comparable data or no objective “better”.

Output specs

Winner: Seedance 2.5
Output specs: Veo 3.1 vs Seedance 2.5 (check dates per source in the Evidence list)
MetricVeo 3.1Seedance 2.5Leader
Max length, single generation8 s[1]30 s[4]Seedance 2.5
Max length with extensions148 s (with extensions, 720p)[1]No public data—
Max output resolution2160p (4K) (Standard)[1]720p (BytePlus ModelArk plans)[8]Veo 3.1
Frame rate24 fps[1]No public data—
Aspect ratios16:9 (default), 9:16[1]No public data—
Max reference inputs per generation3[1]50 (images + video + audio)[4]Seedance 2.5

Veo 3.1 leads 1 row, Seedance 2.5 leads 2, 0 tied; rows marked — have no comparable data or no objective “better”.

Features

Tie
Features: Veo 3.1 vs Seedance 2.5 (check dates per source in the Evidence list)
MetricVeo 3.1Seedance 2.5Leader
Native audioYes[2]Yes[4]Tie
Lip-syncNo public dataNo public data—
Text-to-videoYes[2]Yes[4]Tie
Image-to-videoYes[2]Yes[4]Tie
First / last frame controlYes[7]No public data—
Multi-shot in one generationNo public dataYes[4]—
Video editingYes (Lite)[11]Yes (timestamp-level)[4]Tie
Video extensionYes[2]Yes (multi-round)[4]Tie

Veo 3.1 leads 0 rows, Seedance 2.5 leads 0, 5 tied; rows marked — have no comparable data or no objective “better”.

Access

Tie
Access: Veo 3.1 vs Seedance 2.5 (check dates per source in the Evidence list)
MetricVeo 3.1Seedance 2.5Leader
StatusPaid preview in the Gemini API (Google's current model list names veo-3.1-generate-preview and veo-3.1-lite-generate-preview as Preview models; Veo 3.1 Fast rates are still published on the pricing page); also served via Vertex AI, the Gemini app and Flow[7]Generally available — API fully available to clients on BytePlus ModelArk; live in Jimeng Web and Doubao Pro[8]—
Public APIYes[7]Yes (BytePlus ModelArk)[8]Tie
Where to use itGemini API in Google AI Studio and Vertex AI; Gemini app; Flow[7]Jimeng and Doubao apps; Dreamina (international consumer app); API on BytePlus ModelArk[4]—
Regional limitsIn EU, UK, CH and MENA locations, allow_adult is the only permitted personGeneration value[1]No public data—
Release date2025-10-15[7]2026-07-31[4]—

Veo 3.1 leads 0 rows, Seedance 2.5 leads 0, 1 tied; rows marked — have no comparable data or no objective “better”.

Public leaderboards

Winner: Seedance 2.5
Public leaderboards: Veo 3.1 vs Seedance 2.5 (check dates per source in the Evidence list)
MetricVeo 3.1Seedance 2.5Leader
LMArena text-to-video score1364 ±14 (veo-3.1-audio)[5]1474 ±9 (dreamina-seedance-2.5-720p)[5]Seedance 2.5
LMArena text-to-video rank (of 48)#12 (veo-3.1-audio)[5]#7 (dreamina-seedance-2.5-720p)[5]—
LMArena image-to-video score1398 ±10 (veo-3.1-audio)[6]1477 ±7 (dreamina-seedance-2.5-720p)[6]Seedance 2.5
LMArena image-to-video rank (of 48)#13 (veo-3.1-audio)[6]#4 (dreamina-seedance-2.5-720p)[6]—
VGI-Bench overall score32.0[12]No public data—

Veo 3.1 leads 0 rows, Seedance 2.5 leads 2, 0 tied; rows marked — have no comparable data or no objective “better”.

How rows are judged: a lower price, a longer clip, a higher resolution or frame rate, more reference inputs and a supported feature win. Prices of a discontinued product are shown as historical and cannot win. LMArena scores are human-preference ratings (board snapshot dated 2026-09-21, read 2026-10-07); scores whose ± intervals overlap count as a tie. VGI-Bench is a research benchmark of visual reasoning. A row marked — has no comparable data.

Where each model leads

Where Veo 3.1 leads

Everything documented, everything priced. Veo 3.1 publishes its frame rate (24fps), resolutions, extension limits and first-and-last-frame control[1], plus a Fast tier at $0.10/s[3] per 720p second[3]. Consumer access runs through Google AI Pro at $19.99/mo[9] with only a limited Veo 3.1 Lite trial, or Google AI Ultra from $99.99/mo for the full model[9]. If that ladder is steep, AIContentDrop's credit plans include Veo 3.1 from $19/mo[13].

Where Seedance 2.5 leads

References, length and in-place edits. Up to 30 images, 10 video clips and 10 audio clips can steer one generation[4], output arrives as logically connected multi-shot sequences, and timestamp-level editing fixes a section without re-rendering the rest. You can try Seedance 2.5 as served on AIContentDrop ; for how it differs from its own stablemates, read our Seedance 2.5, Seedance 2.0 and Minimax H3 notes .

Which should you choose?

Pick Veo 3.1 if…

you deliver 4K, need a fixed frame rate, or bill per second: every Veo 3.1 price and output spec sits in public Google documentation[3].

Pick Seedance 2.5 if…

arena standing and single-pass length outweigh resolution: 30 s[4] takes, 50[4] reference inputs, and the stronger score on both public boards.

Frequently asked questions

Which model wins on public leaderboards?

Seedance 2.5, on both boards that list the pair. LMArena text-to-video: rank #7[5] (1474[5]) against rank #12[5] (1364[5]) for veo-3.1-audio. LMArena image-to-video: rank #4[6] (1477[6]) against rank #13[6] (1398[6]).

Which produces higher-resolution video?

Veo 3.1 on the published record: 1080p and 4K for 8-second clips, 720p otherwise[1]. Seedance 2.5's official plan cards list only 480p and 720p[8]; there is no public data for anything higher.

Which is cheaper per second?

Not directly comparable. Google publishes Veo 3.1 rates from $0.05/s[3] (Lite, 720p) to $0.60/s[3] (Standard, 4K). ByteDance publishes no per-second API price for Seedance 2.5; the closest first-party figure is Dreamina's promotional $0.035 per generated second at 720p[10], a consumer app rate.

Which makes the longer video?

Per pass, Seedance 2.5: 30 s[4] against 8 s[1]. With extensions, Veo 3.1 documents a ceiling of 148 s[1] at 720p[1], while Seedance 2.5 supports multi-round extension without a published maximum[4].

Are both available through an API today?

Yes, with different maturity. Seedance 2.5's API is generally available on BytePlus ModelArk[8]. Veo 3.1 is a paid preview in the Gemini API and also served through Vertex AI, the Gemini app and Flow[7].

Evidence

Only official sources are cited: vendor pages, and leaderboard publishers for their own rankings. Anything we could not find on such a page is shown as “No public data”.

  1. Gemini API — Generate videos with Veo — Google. ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/veo. Checked 2026-10-06
  2. Gemini API — Video generation docs index — Google. ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/video. Checked 2026-10-06
  3. Gemini API — Pricing (Veo 3.1 Standard / Fast / Lite) — Google. ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing. Checked 2026-10-06
  4. Introducing Seedance 2.5 — One-Take Creation, Flexible Referencing — ByteDance Seed. seed.bytedance.com/en/blog/one-take-creation-flexible-referencing-i…. Checked 2026-10-06
  5. Text-to-Video Arena leaderboard — LMArena (arena.ai). arena.ai/leaderboard/text-to-video. Checked 2026-10-06
  6. Image-to-Video Arena leaderboard — LMArena (arena.ai). arena.ai/leaderboard/image-to-video. Checked 2026-10-06
  7. Introducing Veo 3.1 and new creative capabilities in the Gemini API — Google Developers Blog. developers.googleblog.com/introducing-veo-3-1-and-new-creative-capa…. Checked 2026-10-06
  8. Dreamina-seedance-2.5 API Now Fully Available to Clients — BytePlus (ByteDance). www.byteplus.com/en/product/seedance. Checked 2026-10-06
  9. Google AI plans (Google One, US pricing) — Google. one.google.com/intl/en_us/about/google-ai-plans. Checked 2026-10-06
  10. Seedance 2.5 pricing (Dreamina) — Dreamina (ByteDance / CapCut). dreamina.capcut.com/seedance/seedance-2-5-pricing-2026. Checked 2026-10-06
  11. Gemini API — Models list (Veo 3.1, Veo 3.1 Lite) — Google. ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/models. Checked 2026-10-06
  12. VGI-Bench leaderboard (EMNLP 2026) — VGI-Bench research team. hexuan21.github.io/VGI-Bench. Checked 2026-10-06
  13. AIContentDrop — Pricing — AIContentDrop. aicontentdrop.com/pricing. Checked 2026-10-07